Computing, Libraries, Tennis, India & other interests of Vikas Kamat
|Perversion is in the eyes of the beholder|| |
| Some Hindus are campaigning against providing patronage to M.F. Husain's
paintings, and I have also received
They are complaining that M.F. Husain has painted Hindu deities in nude.
Guys, cloth is man-made!
Showing men, women (and gods) in nude is a honest
and most natural way to depict them.
What is so offensive about nudity anyway? Hindus are ones who invented nudism. Aren't we the culture that worships
The accusers say Husain's paintings are disgusting, instead of
They say Husain is insulting Hindus.
Do you know the difference between Islamic fundamentalists and Hindu
fundamentalists? The answer is none. They are both intolerant, ignorant fools.
This picture shows Hanuman
burning the island of Sri Lanka with a torch as Sita hangs on to his tail. The
accusers are saying Husain meant to depict Sita masturbating. Perversion is indeed in the eyes of the beholder.
Perhaps M.F. Husain is guilty. He is guilty of being a Muslim. He is also guilty of being a genius.
Asian Arts: M.F. Hussain's Paintings Exhibit
Pictures and Tales from Indian Mythologies
The Linga Worship
|First Written: Tuesday, November 22, 2005|
Last Modified: 11/23/2005 8:33:08 AM
|This is how I surf the web. Turns out
creating your own start page beats all portals, back-flipping,
personalized corporate pages, and book-marking tools.